Close

Chicago Legal Malpractice Lawyer Blog

Updated:

Court Holds That Client Cannot relitigate Attorney’s Withdrawal in Malpractice case

The Supreme Court of Washington has held that a client who sues his former attorney for legal malpractice may not allege that the lawyer’s withdrawal from the underlying case was improper if that withdrawal was approved by a judge. The court succinctly puts the issue this way: In this case,…

Updated:

What Happens if you settle the underlying case?

One of the more vexing issues in the area of legal malpractice is what happens when the plaintiff settles the underlying case. In most states, the plaintiff would have to prove that but for the negligence of the defendant attorney, he would have obtained a better financial result in the…

Updated:

West Virginia Suspends Lawyer for 30 days for Failing to File Habeas Corpus Petition on Time.

West Virginia has suspended an attorney for 30 days for failing to file a client’s amended habeas corpus petition on time. This is another case in which disciplinary authorities have prosecuted a negligence case. The attorney was found to have violated Rule 1.3 (failing to act with reasonable diligence) and…

Updated:

Condominium Unit Owner Lacks Standing to Sue the Lawyer for the Condominium Association

This issue comes up fairly frequently and almost all of the courts which have considered it have answered it the exact same way. An owner of a unit of a condominium does not have standing to sue the attorney for the condominium association. The lawyer for the association is responsible…

Updated:

ARDC Files Complaint Against Lawyer Who Failed to Prevent Conversion by His Law Partner

This case (which is merely a complaint now that has not been proven) is a reminder that an attorney can be prosecuted by the ARDC for failing to safeguard client funds when he personally did not convert the funds. In this case, the allegations are that the lawyer’s partner converted…

Updated:

Appellate Court Holds that Expert Not Needed Where Legal Malpractice Was Obvious

This case is potentially important. It addresses a long-running issue – when a plaintiff must hire a legal malpractice expert. The Plaintiff must do so when expert testimony is needed to explain the standard of care to the jury. Here, the lawyer was hired to file a Medicaid application on…

Updated:

Plaintiff Lacks Standing Because Legal Malpractice Case Was An Asset of the Bankruptcy Estate

This case is instructive for plaintiff lawyers because it is a reminder that, if the client has filed for bankruptcy, the claim for legal malpractice may belong to the bankruptcy estate. Because the alleged negligence occurred before the bankruptcy petition was filed, the claim belonged to the bankruptcy estate. Source:…

Contact The Clinton Law Firm