Katz v. Katten Muchin 2021 IL App (1st) 200331, is a malpractice case in which the Illinois Appellate court reversed the dismissal of a legal malpractice case. Andre Katz filed a petition to be appointed the temporary guardian of his mother on June 9, 2017. He learned that his mother…
Chicago Legal Malpractice Lawyer Blog
Legal Malpractice Claim Revived By Illinois Appellate Court
Bielfeldt v. Graves, 2021 IL App (3d) 200118-U, should be a published opinion. In any event, it stands for the proposition that a legal malpractice claim was timely under the federal savings statute. Here a timely legal malpractice claim was filed in federal court. The federal court dismissed that claim…
Rojo v. Tunick Is An Important Legal Malpractice Decision Because It Distinguishes the Actual Innocence Rule
Rojo v. Tunick, 2021 Il App (2d) 200191, is a legal malpractice case filed by a criminal defendant against his former lawyer. Usually these cases are quickly resolved because the plaintiff cannot plead actual innocence. Since Rojo was convicted he could not plead actual innocence. However, Rojo alleged a second…
My CLE Presentation on Avoiding Malpractice Claims in Litigation
avoiding-malpractice-claims-in-litigation This program is designed for the attorney who wants basic beginning principles on how to avoid malpractice claims. I would describe it as a beginner-level program.
The Economics of a Legal Malpractice Case
In every legal malpractice case, the plaintiff is required to hire an expert witness, a lawyer, to testify that the defendant breached the standard of care. This is also required in medical malpractice cases. Experts cost money that will inevitably reduce any recovery. So when you think of filing a…
Actual Innocence Rule Applies – Malpractice Case Dismissed
In a recent California legal malpractice case, Andrade v. Purviance, No. A161331, California Court of Appeal, 1st Appellate District 2021, the court upheld the dismissal of a legal malpractice case against a criminal defense attorney where the plaintiff could not show that she had been exonerated. In recent years, some…
No Coverage Where Insured Knew Basis of Claim Before Policy’s Start Date
The case is ALPS Prop. & Cas. v. Keller, Reynolds 482 P.3d 638 (Montana, 2021). After purchasing the malpractice insurance policy, the firm sought to tender a malpractice claim to the insurer. Unfortunately for the lawyers, the insurer denied coverage because the law firm knew the basis of the malpractice…
Proximate Causation Requirement Defeats Bankruptcy Malpractice Claim
In any lawsuit, the plaintiff must prove proximate causation, that the actions of the defendant caused him injury. Here, in a bankruptcy malpractice case, the plaintiff was unable to prove proximate causation. Plaintiff alleged that the bankruptcy lawyers breached the standard of care when the failed to extinguish a liability…
Court Holds That Client Has Stated Claim for Legal Malpractice Against Bankruptcy Firm
Horvath v. Budin, Reisman, Kupferberg & Bernstein, LLP, 2021 NY Slip Op 30105 is a legal malpractice claim arising out of a bankruptcy matter. In particular, the claim was that the bankruptcy firm failed to list Horvath’s personal injury case in the bankruptcy schedules, resulting in the loss of that…
In Illinois The Statute of Limitations Usually Expires Two Years After An Adverse Judgment
Short v. Grayson, No. 16-cv-2150 N.D. IL, September 3, 2021 is a malpractice case where the plaintiff alleged that his lawyer was negligent in handling litigation. The problem was that the litigation reached a final adverse judgment in 2013, but the malpractice case was not filed for three years. The…